When accidents occur or when disease strikes everyone wants high quality medical care. There are many world class hospitals in every city, but the sad fact is that these facilities are restricted to those that can afford them. Only those with medical insurance or that have ample cash reserves have access to the latest treatment methods and the best doctors. Those that cannot afford such services must depend upon Calgary walk in clinics.
This type of medical facility is very broadly defined. In some cases there are small facilities inside super markets. These are normally staffed by nursing personnel. Other facilities focus on emergencies and trauma. Yet others are operated by charities. There are also a number of community health services. Prices differ wildly, often depending upon the type of staffing they enjoy. Some are free of charge, however.
Many people erroneously think that all these facilities offer urgent care services. This is not the case. At many facilities there are only very basic services available. The majority of services do not even have an attending physician. It is therefore advisable to find out just what facilities there are, what services they offer and what they charge. In most areas there are at least one or two facilities within a convenient distance of most of the population.
Clearly, the main benefit of these medical facilities is the fact that their services are either free or at least at a minimal fee. Patients can simply attend. No appointments are necessary and the attending staff normally treat patients on a first arrived first helped basis, but emergencies always enjoy priority, of course. Patients are accepted without having to answer potentially awkward questions on citizenship, for example.
Unfortunately, many of these facilities have to tend to large numbers of patients. This result in long queues and sometimes very long waiting periods. In addition, due to limited staff and facilities, patients are rushed through. In many cases patients cannot be helped simply because the facility does not have the equipment, medication or skilled staff necessary to deal with the problem at hand.
Critics say that these facilities are inadequate and that they simply prove the fact that adequate health care for all is a fallacy. They also complain that very few of these facilities are equipped with the latest diagnostic tools and that they often carry only a very limited range of medication. In many cases patients are treated by staff that are not properly trained.
Doctors have also voiced their criticism. They suggest that it is only possible to treat a patient properly if there is a proper and comprehensive health record available. If this is not the case, patients can be treated symptomatically and serious conditions underlying the symptoms can be overlooked. They say that this can lead to unnecessary complications and even death.
Public health care remains a controversial issue. Millions cannot afford the very best medical care and have to be satisfied with what they can best afford. The answer, reformers argue, is an overhaul of the health care system. They say that every citizen should have access to quality health care.
This type of medical facility is very broadly defined. In some cases there are small facilities inside super markets. These are normally staffed by nursing personnel. Other facilities focus on emergencies and trauma. Yet others are operated by charities. There are also a number of community health services. Prices differ wildly, often depending upon the type of staffing they enjoy. Some are free of charge, however.
Many people erroneously think that all these facilities offer urgent care services. This is not the case. At many facilities there are only very basic services available. The majority of services do not even have an attending physician. It is therefore advisable to find out just what facilities there are, what services they offer and what they charge. In most areas there are at least one or two facilities within a convenient distance of most of the population.
Clearly, the main benefit of these medical facilities is the fact that their services are either free or at least at a minimal fee. Patients can simply attend. No appointments are necessary and the attending staff normally treat patients on a first arrived first helped basis, but emergencies always enjoy priority, of course. Patients are accepted without having to answer potentially awkward questions on citizenship, for example.
Unfortunately, many of these facilities have to tend to large numbers of patients. This result in long queues and sometimes very long waiting periods. In addition, due to limited staff and facilities, patients are rushed through. In many cases patients cannot be helped simply because the facility does not have the equipment, medication or skilled staff necessary to deal with the problem at hand.
Critics say that these facilities are inadequate and that they simply prove the fact that adequate health care for all is a fallacy. They also complain that very few of these facilities are equipped with the latest diagnostic tools and that they often carry only a very limited range of medication. In many cases patients are treated by staff that are not properly trained.
Doctors have also voiced their criticism. They suggest that it is only possible to treat a patient properly if there is a proper and comprehensive health record available. If this is not the case, patients can be treated symptomatically and serious conditions underlying the symptoms can be overlooked. They say that this can lead to unnecessary complications and even death.
Public health care remains a controversial issue. Millions cannot afford the very best medical care and have to be satisfied with what they can best afford. The answer, reformers argue, is an overhaul of the health care system. They say that every citizen should have access to quality health care.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire